Privacy and CCTV
Many people feel like they lost their privacy because they are constantly monitored by camera. Also, CCTV place negative impact of surveillance on civil liberties. Other claim the Close Circuit TV does not decrease crime. Instead, criminal just change the location. CCTV actually speared around the city because criminal tried to avoid surveillance camera that are most likely installed in bad neighborhood.
Home used of CCTV also raise the concern of privacy. Many claim that CCTV can be used to prevent break-in. However, some household use it with bad faith to monitor their neighbor. A household Close Circuit TV are more likely to monitor person who has been shown to have engaged in conduct which caused or was likely to cause alarm, harassment or distress to one or more persons not of the same household as himself .
Also, some used CCTV to take a peek of other without permission. They set up camera monitor other’s bathroom or living room. In some extreme case, criminal install camera in public bathroom and sell the video to others.
Previously a CCTV operator in Glamorgan was convicted on obscenity charges after making obscene phone calls to people he had been spying on. Other specific examples include a video Caught in the Act, released in 1996 which featured various couples having sex, captured on CCTV, and broadcast of footage of a man, Geoff Peck, attempting to commit suicide.
The Data Protection Act 1998 in the United Kingdom led to legal restrictions being imposed on the use that CCTV footage can be put to, and also mandated their registration with the Data Protection Agency. The successor to the DPA, the Information Commissioner in 2004 clarified that this required registration of all CCTV systems with the Commissioner, and prompt deletion of archived footage. However subsequent case law (Durant vs. FSA) has limited the scope of the legal protection provided by this law, and not all CCTV systems are currently regulated.
Currently there is no such Act in United state and Canada. Many lawyer in United State CCTV video can not used as evident because it violate the Fourth Amendment -The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. However, the courts have generally not taken this view.
In Canada, it is legal to install surveillance camera inside their company, even in changing room. In some fitness centre, have numerous video cameras in the men's changing room that record men changing and showering.
